Movie Review Blogs

THE SECRET AGENT 2025 – 2.5 STARS

The preview for The Secret Agent left a lot of unanswered questions. The movie doesn’t do much to answer those questions. After nearly an hour and a half, we just start to get an idea of who Armando/Marcelo is (a researcher), who is after him (two hitmen hired by a shady businessman Henique Ghirotti), and a possible plausible explanation as to why (personal grudge over a fight at dinner?). If the hit was because Armando was upset about the shady tactics by Ghirotti, why didn’t Ghirotti go after everyone at the research facility?

SENTIMENTAL VALUE – 3.5 STARS

It wasn’t so much the story or the film itself that made it watchable as it was the actors in their character arcs and performances. They weren’t over-the-top, they weren’t caricatures, they were realistic and relatable. And for that, I raised my rating. I originally predicted 3 Stars, but ended up giving Sentimental Value 3.5 Stars. Probably won’t watch it again, but definitely worth the once around. 

MARTY SUPREME – 2 STARS

Marty Supreme is all over the place. Marty is unlikeable. He’s a scammer and a schemer. He’s a unibrowed, pock-faced, scrawny, annoying, mean person whose lies are completely transparent and immediately unravel, and yet inexplicably women and businessmen continue to come back for more. They preview claims that no one believes in him, but the problem is that too many people keep falling for his schemes. No one doubts that he’s a great table tennis player. He’s one of the, if not the, best in the country. And yet, he has no sponsor, no backing, no billing. He just shows up to these international tournaments and he’s the country’s representative as long as he shows up? That doesn’t make sense.

BUGONIA – 4.5 STARS

His nomination for Best Picture of the Year is director Yorgos Lanthimos’ 7th Oscar nomination having received nods previously for other oddly wonderful films like Poor Things and The Lobster. It’s no surprise that Bugonia came from the mind of Yorgos, nor is it a surprise that it has been nominated for Best Picture. It was weird, uncomfortable, poignant, intriguing, and superb.

It’s also no surprise that Emma Stone has been nominated for Best Actress for her portrayal of the Andromedan Empress posing as the CEO of a pharmaceutical company on earth. She’s won for her performances in La La Land and Poor Things. Emma, Jesse Plemons, and Aidan Delbis all gave all-star performances.

F1: THE MOVIE – 3.5 STARS

What F1: The Movie lacks that all the other Kosinski, Bruckheimer collaborations like this have is depth and soul. Days of Thunder, Top Gun, Top Gun: Maverick, we were just as invested in the characters themselves as we were white-knuckled by the action. Joshua is billed as this hot-headed cocky young driver, but really he’s just young and inexperienced. The odd thing is, he doesn’t even really have natural instincts, something the arrogant protégé usually has in these movies. And he’s really not even a jerk as the preview and synopsis desperately make him out to be. He loves his mother, he loves racing, he quickly understands what Sonny can bring to the table, through he’s reluctant to accept it. But it’s not because he’s a jerk or even arrogant, he’s afraid of losing the spotlight and losing his place on the team.

TRAIN DREAMS – 3.5 STARS

Don’t overthink Train Dreams. It really is pretty much what is advertised. It’s the story of Robert Grainier and his life in Idaho as a logger. How he was lost until he met Gladys and began a truly wonderful love and life together. How he worked and met interesting people along the way. How he was destroyed when he lost Gladys and Kate in the fire. And how he somehow managed to keep going every day.

It’s a simple, slow-paced, beautiful, tragic story. It touches on complex issues that are still relevant over 100 years later. Immigration, racism, family, finances, work, advancements in technology. The characters aren’t heroic, aren’t quirky geniuses, aren’t villains, aren’t from other worlds, aren’t warriors or conquerors. But they are enchanting and fascinating.

SINNERS – 3.5 STARS

It’s a decent movie with a unique telling of a story that’s been told who knows how many times. Vampires. Michael B. Jordan does a great job playing the dual roles of twin brothers Smoke and Stack. The rest of the ensemble is absolutely spot on as well. Hailee Steinfeld stands out as giving an amazing, raw, fun, and terrifying performance. And Wunmi Mosaku earned herself an Oscar nomination for her performance as Smoke’s wife Aimee. In fact, Sinners has just been nominated for a staggering and record-setting sixteen nominations including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor.

HAMNET – 4.5 STARS

The love story is so sweet and pure and uncontrollable. What happened to them was so tragic. The tribute and how it affected both William and Agnes was so genuine. Their chemistry was authentic and mesmerizing. Who cares that they aren’t the biggest Hollywood heavyweights . . . yet. I thought it was fantastic and I’m rooting for it to take home several awards at the Oscars. I originally gave a hopeful 4.5 Star Prediction and that’s exactly what Hamnet delivered . . . 4.5 Stars and near perfection.

ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER – 3.0 STARS

One Battle After Another is not a comedy. It’s not a dark comedy. It had a couple failed attempts at humor that really didn’t land. It was tragic and heart-breaking and about 60% of the movie was Bob and Willa attempting to flee and escape from Lockjaw and his men.

The music was interesting throughout the movie with clips from Eye of the Tiger, Shut Up and Dance, Goosebumps, Soldier Boy, and even Hark the Herald Angels Sing by Ella Fitzgerald. The most unusual and distracting piece was a not-so-subtle and inexplicable homage to the Wizard of Oz theme song for Miss Gulch / The Wicked Witch.

TOP FAVORITE CHRISTMAS MOVIES 2025 EDITION

This post is long overdue. My previous top Christmas Movie list was done 9 years ago in 2016. Number 1 and Number 2 are always easy. They’ve been the same for decades now and I don’t know if there will ever come a movie that knocks them out of the top spot. But we’ll get to those. For now, let’s start with a few honorable mentions.

KLAUS – 4.0 STARS

The animation in Klaus was so beautiful. A mix of classic 2D hand drawn combined with modern CGI enhancements. It really helps to sell the movie as a modern Christmas classic.

Klaus was both humorous and extremely touching. There was clever comedy as well as some silly slapstick, but it was all well delivered throughout the movie. And while the ending was somewhat predictable, even from the preview, there were so many wonderful touching moments throughout the film.

FRANKENSTEIN 2025 – 3.5 STARS

Frankenstein 2025 is a beautiful, tragic, terrible, exciting retelling of Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel. Guillermo del Toro is able to take the grotesque macabre nature of Victor’s work and make it fascinating, technical, even beautiful. The scene where Victor is piecing together the Creature with body parts from corpses is so excruciatingly detailed both visually and auditorily, but it is not done simply for a shock, it is a crucial piece to the story and is done so well.

WICKED FOR GOOD – 5.0 STARS

Wicked and Wicked For Good were such perfect adaptations of the Broadway Musical, which was a brilliant adaptation from Gregory Maguire’s 1995 Novel. Once again, the musical performances and dance routines by the entire cast were flawless. Even the ones that might get overlooked like Wonderful, sung by the Wizard, Glinda, and Elphaba. Yes, it was much needed comic relief in a very dark and sad movie, but it was also just a great song.

ONCE – 3.0 STARS

Well, Once isn’t the typical love story. There’s definitely some feelings between Guy and Girl, some flirting. Guy asks her to spend the night right after they met, and Girl makes a quick reference to some hanky panky. Other than that, it’s really rather innocent. Guy says his girl cheated on him and broke his heart, and sings a rather angry song on the bus about how she hurt him, but the montage of their time together was quite sweet. Was he saying that just to win sympathy points with Girl? And her guy didn’t seem like a bad guy at all either.

HAPPY GILMORE 2 – 3.0 STARS

Look, Happy Gilmore 2 was obviously a fun passion project for Adam Sandler. He got all his old friends back on screen. Rob Schneider, Kevin Nealon, Ben Stiller, Robert Smigel, Jon Lovitz, Steve Buscemi. He brought on pro golfers and his entire family. And he brought in a bevy of random celebrities to make cameos from Bad Bunny to Post Malone to Travis Kelce to Reggie Bush to Eminem to Guy Fieri and more.

THE AMATEUR – 4.0 STARS

The Amateur opens with Charlie Heller (Rami Malek) going over parts to an old Cessna plane, a gift from his wife Sarah (Rachel Brosnahan). She is about to leave on a trip to London and invites him to join her. He says he can’t as he’s on to something at his job in the Decryption and Analysis division of the CIA. The loving couple exchange I love yous and goodbye’s as she leaves.

THE MONKEY – 4.5 STARS

The Monkey is based on Stephen King’s 1980 short story. It seems like Stephen King had a series of completely random, creative, bloody, awful ways of having people die and strung them all together via a drum-playing toy monkey. Forty-five years later, son of Anthony Perkins (star of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho), Osgood Perkins brought the short story to life . . . and death.

Seemingly random events transpiring in a specific order to result in the death of a character is not a new concept. Final Destination has an entire franchise of movies and books based on the idea. But only Stephen King’s warped and brilliant mind would use a toy monkey as the catalyst while also making the story and destruction uncomfortably humorous as well.

OSCAR WINNERS: 2025

Well, Anora took home the honors of Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actress, Original Screenplay, and Editing. Personally, I thought the celebration of this film was disappointing. I found it loud, unnecessarily raunchy with annoying and unambitious characters who had no redeeming qualities. I guess I was in the minority. Conan O’Brien was a great host, some of the acceptance speeches were very touching, and I did pretty well in my picks.

EMILIA PEREZ – 3.5 STARS

If I was just going off the preview for Emilia Perez, I would have absolutely no idea what I was getting into. I think it’s a fascinating story. A ruthless drug cartel transitions to a woman and then becomes an activist helping victims find their lost loved ones? That’s great. And a musical? I’m a sucker for musicals. This was unlike any musical I’ve ever seen before. Most of the time, the singing came out of nowhere. I know some may argue that’s a characteristic of nearly all musicals, and there have even been movies that poke fun at that fact. But many of the songs in Emilia Perez really came out of left field and weren’t so much songs as they were a few lines of dialogue that were sung . . . and many times sung not in tune. The shining star in that aspect was Zoe Saldana whose singing and dancing was really beautiful and strong and carried the musical aspect of the movie. And yet, this is really the first time we heard this type of performance from her.

DUNE: PART TWO – 4 STARS

Like the first installation of the Dune Trilogy (or more), Dune: Part Two had a lot going on with many characters, groups, planets, locations to keep track of. They do a great job of keeping the viewer engaged in what’s going on and where you are and who is who. It definitely helps to have watched the first movie. Dune: Part Two does not do a lot of recapping to let you know how you got to the opening scene. Which is fine. The movie is nearly three hours long as it is. We didn’t need a long recap. However, in spite of being so long, we find out that Part Two is not the end.

NICKEL BOYS – 3.5 STARS

I loved the filming choices made by RaMell Ross. Delivering so much of Nickel Boys from the vantage point of the speaker puts your right into the story. It’s a little disjointed at times. There’s not necessarily a smooth transition from one scene to the next at times. But, again, that’s often how we remember things. Moments. Events. Feelings. Emotions. Connections. Relationships. It was a powerful and authentic telling of these events.

THE SUBSTANCE – 2.5 STARS

I really enjoyed about 85% of The Substance. It was heartbreaking to watch Elisabeth, still absolutely stunningly beautiful, look at herself and see ugliness. It was infuriating to watch Harvey treat her so dismissively in his gluttonous, slimy way. Demi Moore was fantastic, authentic, sincere, relatable. Dennis Quaid was perfectly despicable. He really gave off Coriolanus Snow vibes from The Hunger Games. And Margaret Qualley was wonderful as the perfect beauty queen everyone wants to see while also harboring a dark, sadistic side.

THE BRUTALIST – 2.5 STARS

From the preview, it’s not exactly clear what the drama in The Brutalist would be. We’re given no indications of the heroin addiction or sexual trauma between Laszlo and his wife, between Harry and Zsofia, and between Harrison and Laszlo. It seems almost as though Laszlo is intentionally selected not for his architectural acumen, but rather because of his Jewish and foreign heritage. It seems it may be a type of “Dinner For Schmucks” scenario, though obviously not a comedy. The preview hints that perhaps the Toths are there simply for the amusement, derision, and abuse of the rich who have nothing better to do.

ANORA – 1 STAR

Anora was not cute. It was not funny. It was not romantic. It was not tragic. Neither of these characters had any redeeming qualities about them. Ani wasn’t ambitious that we were made aware of. We’re never told why she’s working where she’s working or what she’s working towards. Ivan is a child who enjoys video games, sex, and partying. He is not charming, he is not clever, he is not sweet, he is not romantic. He is the son of rich parents. That’s it. And neither of them grow or develop or evolve through this annoying movie.

CONCLAVE – 3.5 STARS

Conclave is slow and intentional. There’s a real dichotomy throughout. There is an urgency to find out the truth about various Cardinals who will potentially become the next Pope, and this must be done with haste as the proceedings are already underway. But there’s also a hesitancy from Thomas torn between duty to God and just getting the Conclave over with and put all the controversy behind. He doesn’t want to know the truth, but he must. And it’s a race against the clock, but the clock is slow moving as they adhere to the voting traditions that take days or longer to execute. This is not a film to have casually playing in the background.

WICKED PART I – 5 STARS

Wicked Part I was such an amazing movie adaptation of the Broadway Musical. My biggest concern was the use of CGI. The temptation would be to go overboard since you basically have a magical world that doesn’t exist to create with only your imagination as your limit. Director Jon M. Chu used it perfectly. One scene in particular is the mechanical train that takes Elphaba and Glinda to Oz. While you’re watching, you have no idea how much of that is an actual set piece and how much was digitally created. So you don’t even think about it while you’re watching. You just accept that it’s really there. And that is how CGI should be used. Imperceptibly. And it was magical and perfect throughout the movie.

BEETLEJUICE BEETLEJUICE REVIEW – 3 STARS

Like many fans of the original, I was excited to finally see Beetlejuice Beetlejuice. The preview doesn’t really give you much of a plot reveal. The preview itself would have to be ten minutes long just to try to fit in all the odd things going on they tried to squeeze in. The nice thing about the 1988 film was its simplicity. Barbara and Adam Maitland bought a house in Connecticut. They were a simple, loving couple who died tragically in a car accident. They must try to figure out their place in the realm of the unliving while dealing with the new tenants of their beloved home, the Deetz’s. Beetlejuice gets in the mix and chaos ensues. There were really two or three sub plots in Beetlejuice Beetlejuice that I could have done without. And the flashback sequences were just . . . weird. They didn’t fit and there were much better ways that those events could have been explained.

DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE REVIEW – 4 STARS

It was everything Deadpool has set us up for in the first two movies, it delivered exactly what we’d expect, it repeated the same formula ad nauseum for over two hours, and it never got old. It was hilarious and entertaining without being clever or original. And not many other films than Deadpool or actors other than Reynolds could have pulled that off.

BEVERLY HILLS COP: AXEL F REVIEW – 3.5 STARS

There’s nothing magical about Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F. It’s just been 30 years, the first 3 were very successful (well, the first 2 at least). So why not squeeze another drop by duplicating the formula? Lots of franchises do it. Die Hard featured a wise-cracking New York cop who had to take out terrorists . . . repeatedly. John Wick was desperately trying to get out of the “family”, but they kept finding ways for him to shoot hundreds of bad guys. Bad Boys with Mike and Marcus also cracking jokes as they destroy everything in sight to get the bad guys. And, like those movies, there’s not much to figure out with the Beverly Hills movies. In each one, we knew pretty early on who the bad guys are. And the bad guys know right away that Foley is on to them. So it’s really just about getting evidence and destroying things as he does it with a bit of humor sprinkled in the mix.

HIT MAN REVIEW – 3 STARS

I didn’t expect much from Hit Man, and it delivered what was expected. As far as hit man comedies go, I prefer Mr. Right with Anna Kendrick and Sam Rockwell. But it was fun to see Glen Powell take center stage and put on a wide array of fun characters. He’s always been the number 2 in movies like Hidden Figures and Top Gun: Maverick. He’s got a Captain America look and I could easily see him joining a super hero franchise. He also plays a cocky, confident, snarky role quite well, so perhaps that super hero is not unlike Deadpool. I thought it was a very interesting scenario, a decently-written script, a couple obvious twists and turns. But it was the reactions to those turns that was not-so-obvious.

GHOSTBUSTERS FROZEN EMPIRE REVIEW – 4 STARS

In 1984, comedy writing, directing, and acting geniuses put together an iconic sci-fi ghost movie that became in instant and long-running classic. As with most successful movies like this, they all came back for a sequel in 1989. Unlike many sequels, this one lived up to expectations. So the formula should work, right?

For the most part, it did. 

THE HOLDOVERS REVIEW – 3 STARS

I really wanted to like The Holdovers more than I did. I found it to be slow, tough to stay engaged. There were some moments, but not enough to hold the 2 hour 13 minute film. And I didn’t get it. Paul Hunham (Giamatti) is described in reviews and portrayed in the preview as this hated, bitter, cranky teacher. But really, he had a very soft spot for Mary Lamb (Randolph), for Angus Tully (Sessa), for Miss Lydia Crane (Preston). He was sentimental, he was a good listener, he was passionate about his profession and the subject of history. For some reason, he took delight in the demise of the students at Barton Academy he felt were entitled, who didn’t care, who didn’t appreciate what they had. But we never understand why.

BARBIE 2023 REVIEW – 4 STARS

I really enjoyed Barbie a lot. The writing and casting were perfect. I found myself laughing out loud, cringing at our own lack of progress in equality, and being touched by the performances and writing around an iconic character who by design is ridiculously impossibly perfect. It was brilliant.

MATILDA THE MUSICAL REVIEW – 4 STARS

Even though this is a musical, this version of Roald Dahl’s book, Matilda the Musical, is much darker and tragic than the 1996 movie with Mara Wilson. In this version, there is no older brother. In the movie, her older dimwitted brother was the primary instigator in the Wormwood house. This actually helped to soften the tormenting from Matilda’s parents who were more confused than anything else. They didn’t understand her. She was a genius and wanted to read and learn more, something her family deemed useless. They didn’t know how to raise her and had no bond with her. In this version, they just truly despise her. They don’t even know her well enough to recognize that they don’t understand her. They simply don’t want her. 

THE LITTLE MERMAID 2023 REVIEW – 5 STARS

Disney has struck gold with another masterful re-imagining of one of their all-time classic animated movies, The Little Mermaid. As with each animation the Disney team attempts to bring to life with actual humans and realistic CGI, some difficult choices must be made. Of course animals can’t talk like in Lion King or Jungle Book, of course dressers and tea cups can’t come to life like in Beauty and the Beast, of course there’s no such thing as a magic flying carpet and blue Genie like in Aladdin, of course elephants can’t fly like in Dumbo. But in a cartoon, anything is achievable. The trick is making those cartoons come to life in the most realistic way possible. In each movie, while they have all stayed true to their original story, some scenes and some lyrics have been changed for a modern remake. And save one slightly out of place ballad from Prince Eric, The Little Mermaid made perfect choices.